The project focuses on the group of people who, due to persistent difficulties in meeting the demands of today's labour market, need adjustments in their employment. Our experience is that too many initiatives today are designed based on the idea that individuals should develop skills or otherwise change to be able to live up to the demands of the labour market. The method development in the project is about finding a model that makes circularity of reusable building materials an arena for work integration that is economically viable at all stages and thus enables lasting adapted employment for groups that need it. The fact that it carries itself at all stages is a prerequisite for being able to create precisely the permanently adapted jobs that we see missing in the Swedish labour market today - and which we through the project want to strategically influence. Here we see that ASF has a big role to play through its focus and primary purpose on work integration instead of profit distribution while operating in the same support system that is available to all employers and thus can not exercise any unfair competition. We argue that one of the best methods of work integration is to have the opportunity to find and develop one's own work ability with peer supervision at one's own pace and in one's own way. The process of doing this is completely individualized and difficult to capture in manuals and methods, but is instead based on an approach that is based on empowerment processes. The elements of regular training and structured conversations are very limited and the focus is instead on working side by side and thus continuously getting to talk about what is going well, what is difficult and what helps each other. This approach is well proven and described within the framework of the ASF project, but would benefit from having a clearer structure for documentation of the individual's development. Here we will use the Danish so-called BIP research. As we describe in ASF highlights, the whole empowerment process and ASF pedagogy is based on gender equality, accessibility and non-discrimination so those perspectives are well taken care of. Many challenges in improving the above exist within existing structures and regulations. Strategic influence and advocacy is therefore important that it takes place in parallel and closely linked to the concrete work of creating arenas for how the unemployed can be included in the green transition. Within the project, we therefore want to both work with strategic impact and create a model, a test bed for how a system for building recycling can be organized and become an economically sustainable activity that at the same time constitutes an arena for work integration. The concrete activities in which the participants are physically present will therefore focus on: - To develop, through a test bed, a model for how a building recycling system can be organised and become an economically sustainable activity that at the same time constitutes an arena for work integration. It is in this part of the project that the participants are found physically. One challenge we have seen in previous projects is to measure and document the step-shifting target groups do in a way that helps the individual to gain a greater understanding of their own resources and possible difficulties as well as the need for individual adjustments. This is in order to contribute to a realistic picture of what their position on the labour market might look like. To facilitate national implementation of this model, we see a need to work with strategic influence and advocacy in the following areas of knowledge: - the legal and economic conditions for the labour integration of vulnerable groups and what the conditions are for meeting the requirements of today's labour market in terms of the available workforce. What needs to change in order for the labour market to seriously adapt to the conditions of the available workforce in the demographic challenge ahead? Why do social work cooperatives in several European countries have a much greater role in circularity and reuse than ASF in Sweden? Is there a link between the strong Swedish model of cooperation between the social partners and the fact that the social economy is not developing as strongly in Sweden as in the rest of Europe? What does any competition from municipal labour market units look like and what does any impact on local business, growth and regional development look like in general and specifically in the development of functioning markets for circular business models?